Study says conservation slowing animal extinctions
tribune242



GOVERNMENT Ministers attending a Bahamas National Trust breakfast briefing yesterday on shark conservation were urged to introduce early legislation to ban shark fishing in the Bahamas.

Since the announcement by a Mastic Point, Andros, businessman that he was considering expanding his sea cucumber export market to include shark finning to satisfy the Hong Kong market, the protection of sharks has become a priority.

It is estimated that about 40 species of sharks thrive in Bahamian waters. This is attributed to the long-line fishing ban introduced about 20 years ago when sharks were unintentionally scooped up in the long lines dragged along the ocean floor to catch other fish. Other than Palau and the Maldives, which are now shark sanctuaries, the Bahamas also has a healthy --so-far undisturbed -- shark population.

According to the experts this is the first time in its 400-million year existence that sharks have had a predator -- a predator in the form of man who now threatens their existence and eventually the whole marine ecosystem.

It is especially bad news for the Bahamas, its coral reefs, its fisheries and its growing shark tourism market.

Malcolm Ritter, AP science writer, reports that according to a new analysis, on average 52 species of mammals, birds and amphibians are taking a significant step toward extinction each year,

But if not for conservation efforts, the march would be even faster.

Efforts to save endangered animals are making a difference, even as about 1 in 5 of the world's backboned species -- mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish -- are threatened with extinction, according to a study published online in the journal Science.

The report was released as delegates from more than 190 nations meet at a United Nations conference in Nagoya, Japan, to set 20 measurable targets to combat the loss of many diverse species.

"Our results should be a timely wake-up call to governments in Nagoya," said Stuart Butchart, a study author and global research coordinator at BirdLife International. "Biodiversity is in a desperate state. Its situation is getting worse, but our results show we can turn the situation around. We just need greater political will and resources."

The study considered almost 26,000 species of vertebrates -- animals with a backbone -- whose conservation status is on the "Red List" of the International Union for Conservation of Nature. It found that about one-fifth of vertebrate species are "threatened," meaning they are close to going extinct in the near future. That ranges from 13 per cent of birds to 41 per cent of amphibians.

The one-fifth number isn't much of a surprise, but the new study is the first global audit of vertebrates, said Craig Hilton-Taylor of the IUCN, a study author.

To look for trends, the authors used a statistical measure that tracks how particular species have moved among the eight categories of the Red List -- an indication of improvement or worsening of their conservation status. Because of data limitations, they focused on birds, mammals and amphibians. Their results translate to an average of 52 species moving one category closer to extinction each year.

Amphibians, which include frogs and salamanders, showed the fastest decline, with mammals second. The trend was less severe for birds, but still included creatures like the green-coloured Hose's broadbill of Malaysia and Indonesia, which has suffered declines in its forest habitat.

About 1 in 6 declines in conservation status in the study resulted in extinction, the authors said. The extinctions include the golden toad of Costa Rica and a Hawaiian forest bird called the Kamao.

To study whether conservation efforts like protecting habitat or controlling predators were helping, the authors examined cases where a species' status improved, moving away from extinction. That was the case in 68 of the 928 reclassifications they found, almost entirely due to conservation action, the authors said. Nearly all involved mammals or birds, because they have a longer and better-funded history of conservation efforts, the authors said.

Humpback whales, for example, moved from "vulnerable" to being at low risk for extinction because of protections against commercial whaling, the authors said.

In all, the researchers calculated that the overall march toward extinction would have been some 20 per cent faster if no conservation steps had been taken. But they also said the true impact is much greater than their calculations could show.

"Conservation is working, it's just not enough" at current levels, said Ana Rodrigues of the Centre for Evolutionary and Functional Ecology in Montpellier, France, a study author.

Stuart Pimm, a conservation expert at Duke University who didn't participate in the study, agreed that the results contain good news.

"A lot of those species would have been moving a lot faster (toward extinction) if it weren't for conservation efforts," he said. "Conservation efforts really do work, they're just not stemming the full extent of the losses of species. The overall trend is still downhill."

October 27, 2010

tribune242